THE US military
planned to test deadly nerve gas on Australian soldiers in far north
Queensland during the Cold War, declassified documents reveal.
The
Defence and Prime Minister's office files show that the US was strongly
pushing then prime minister Harold Holt's government in the 1960s to
allow tests of two of the deadliest chemical weapons ever developed --
VX and GB, better known as Sarin nerve gas.
The revelation airs this morning on the Nine Network's Sunday program.
It
says the top secret plan involved allowing 200 mainly Australian combat
troops to be aerially bombed and sprayed with the chemical weapons.
It's understood the Iron Range rainforest near Lockhart River in far north Queensland was the likely location for the tests.
Peter
Bailey, a former senior official with Mr Holt, tells the program the
request caused consternation in Canberra, and as far as he knows the
tests never went ahead.
But he says planning was very advanced
in the US, which wanted the operation to be kept secret because the
weapons were illegal under international law.
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, July 8, 2008
The BBC’s embarrassing attempt to dig itself out of a hole that
keeps getting deeper was again exemplified during their latest yellow
journalism hit piece on 9/11 truth, in which they played Larry
Silverstein’s “pull it” comment but edited out the most important part
of the statement, and in doing so changed its context altogether.
An army of informed truth activists are almost tripping over each
other to point out the gargantuan number of errors, ad hominem smear
tactics, bias and shoddy investigative techniques displayed in the
program which aired Sunday in the UK.
Just one such example concerns WTC
complex leaseholder Larry Silverstein’s infamous “pull it” comment
which can be viewed in its entirety below with other clips included for
context in confirming that the term “pull it” is industry jargon for
deliberately demolishing a building.
Watch the clip.
However, in the BBC’s attempt to
convince the viewer that “pull it” meant to withdraw firefighters from
the building, despite the fact that according to NIST’s WTC collapse
lead investigator Shyam Sunder, “There was no firefighting in WTC 7,”
and additionally the FEMA report, which stated “No manual firefighting
actions were taken by FDNY,” the editors carefully snipped out the last
portion of Silverstein’s comments where he states, “and then we watched
the building collapse.”
Cycle through to 20 minutes into the clip to spot the edit.
By deliberately removing “and then we
watched the building collapse,” the BBC has performed a hatchet job on
the whole context of the statement by censoring the fact that the
collapse of WTC 7 was a consequence of the decision to “pull” the
building.
Questions as to how this could have
happened and allegations that news corporations, whether wittingly or
unwittingly, were being fed a script on the day of 9/11 as it unfolded
were met with hostility, and the BBC claimed it had “lost” the tape.
The tape was miraculously
“discovered” again on the eve of the broadcast of their latest hit
piece but the footage was not shown in the program, presumably to avoid
further embarrassment.
Below you can read articles
concerning the mountain of other lies contained in the hit piece and
watch a discussion about the program with Alex Jones and Jason Bermas.
We will be picking apart the BBC’s
latest atrocious effort to claim they have “solved the final mystery of
9/11″ over the course of this week with multiple investigative reports
and as we did last time - debunk this latest hit piece as nothing more
than the revolting stench of yellow journalism.
Seven years after the attacks of 9/11, a global awakening has taken
place, the likes of which the world has never seen. As the corporate-controlled
media dwindles into extinction, a new breed of journalists and activists
has emerged. Click
here to watch 9/11 Chronicles Part One: Truth Rising
online in high quality now!
Alex Jones and Jason Bermas break down the recent BBC hit piece
which labors to explain how the BBC reported the collapse of building 7
23 minutes prior to its actual collapse on September 11, 2001
Flu Mist a
popular over the counter live flu vaccine has been found to contain two
H5N1 DNA markers, these markers seem to have been sewn into the flu
mist vaccine to ensure that H5N1 or another strain of Avian Flu goes
pandemic.
This is going to cause major problems before long, it is imperative that people are warned about flu mist.
Eating high levels of some soy products - including tofu - may raise the risk of memory loss, research suggests.
The study focused on 719 elderly Indonesians living in urban and rural regions of Java.
The
researchers found high tofu consumption - at least once a day - was
associated with worse memory, particularly among the over-68s.
The Loughborough University-led study features in the journal Dementias and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.
Soy products are a major alternative protein source to meat for many people in the developing world.
Quote
This kind of research into the causes of Alzheimer's could lead scientists to new ways of preventing this devastating disease.
Rebecca Wood Alzheimer's Research Trust
But soy consumption is also on the increase in the west, where it is often promoted as a "superfood".
Soy products are rich in micronutrients called phytoestrogens, which mimic the impact of the female sex hormone oestrogen.
There
is some evidence that they may protect the brains of younger and
middle-aged people from damage - but their effect on the ageing brain
is less clear.
The latest study suggests phytoestrogens - in high quantity - may actually heighten the risk of dementia.
Lead
researcher Professor Eef Hogervorst said previous research had linked
oestrogen therapy to a doubling of dementia risk in the over-65s.
She
said oestrogens - and probably phytoestrogens - tended to promote
growth among cells, not necessarily a good thing in the ageing brain.
Alternatively, high doses of oestrogens might promote the damage caused to cells by particles known as free radicals.
A
third theory is that damage is caused not by the tofu, but by
formaldehyde, which is sometimes used in Indonesia as a preservative.
The researchers admit that more research is required to ascertain whether the same effects are found in other ethnic groups.
However,
previous research has also linked high tofu consumption to an increased
risk of dementia in older Japanese American men.
Fermented product
Professor
David Smith, of the University of Oxford, said tofu was a complex food
with many ingredients which might have an impact.
However, he
said: "There seems to be something happening in the brain as we age
which makes it react to oestrogens in the opposite way to what we would
expect."
The latest study also found that eating tempe, a
fermented soy product made from the whole soy bean, was associated with
better memory.
Professor Hogervorst said the beneficial effect
of tempe might be related to the fact that it contains high levels of
the vitamin folate, which is known to reduce dementia risk.
"It
may be that that the interaction between high levels of both folate and
phytoestrogens protects against cognitive impairment."
She also stressed that there was no suggestion that eating tofu in moderation posed a problem.
Rebecca
Wood, of the Alzheimer's Research Trust, which funded the study, said
more research was needed to pin down the potential risks and benefits
of so-called superfoods.
However, she said: "This kind of
research into the causes of Alzheimer's could lead scientists to new
ways of preventing this devastating disease.
"As over half a million people have Alzheimer's in the UK today, there is a desperate need to find a new prevention or cure."
For the last several years, HPV vaccines have been marketed to the
public and mandated in compulsory injections for young girls in several
states based on the idea that they prevent cervical cancer. Now,
NewsTarget has obtained documents from the FDA and other sources (see
below) which reveal that the FDA has been well aware for several years
that Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) has no direct link to cervical cancer.
NewsTarget has also learned that HPV vaccines have been proven to be
flatly worthless in clearing the HPV virus from women who have already
been exposed to HPV (which includes most sexually active women),
calling into question the scientific justification of mandatory
“vaccinate everyone” policies.
Furthermore, this story reveals evidence that the vaccine currently
being administered for HPV — Gardasil — may increase the risk of
precancerous cervical lesions by an alarming 44.6 percent in some
women. The vaccine, it turns out, may be far more dangerous to the
health of women than doing nothing at all.
If true, this information reveals details of an enormous public
health fraud being perpetrated on the American people, involving FDA
officials, Big Pharma promoters, and even the governors of states like
Texas. The health and safety of tens of millions of young girls is at
stake here, and what this NewsTarget investigative report reveals is
that HPV vaccinations may not only be medically useless; they may also be harmful to the health of the young girls receiving them.
This report reveals startling facts about the HPV vaccine that most people will find shocking:
• How it may actually increase the risk of precancerous lesions by 44.6 percent.
• The FDA has, for four years, known that HPV was not the cause of cervical cancer.
• Why mandatory HPV vaccination policies may cause great harm to young girls.
• Why HPV infections are self-limiting and pose no real danger in healthy women
• Little-known FDA documents that reveal astounding facts about Gardasil
• How Big Pharma promoted its Gardasil vaccine using disease mongering and fear mongering
This story begins at a company called HiFi DNA Tech, LLC (http://www.hifidna.com)
a company involved in the manufacture of portable HPV testing devices
based on DNA sequencing analysis. HiFi DNA Tech has been pushing to get
the FDA to classify its HPV detection technology as a “Class II”
virology testing device. To understand why this is a big deal, you have
to understand the differences between “Class II” and “Class III”
virology testing devices.
Based on FDA rules, a Class III virology testing device is one that
is considered by the FDA to have “premarket approval,” meaning that it
cannot yet be sold to the public. In order for such a device to be
marketed to the public, it must be downgraded to Class II status, which
is considered a “special controls” status. Class II devices are,
“…those devices for which the general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but for which there is sufficient information to
establish special controls to provide such assurance, including
performance standards, postmarket surveillance, patient registries,
development and dissemination of guidelines, recommendations, and any
other appropriate actions the agency deems necessary.”
In other words, a Class II device may or may not actually be safe,
but the FDA considers is safe enough to release to the public.
HiFi DNA Tech has been trying to get its HPV detection device downgraded to a Class II device based on the following arguments:
• For more than 20 years, the FDA had regulated the HPV test as a “test for cervical cancer.”
• But since at least 2003, the FDA has changed its position on the
relationship between Human Papilloma Virus and cervical cancer, stating
that the HPV strain is “not associated with cervical cancer.”
• Accordingly, HiFi DNA Tech is arguing that the HPV test it has developed is no longer a test for cervical cancer, but is merely a test for the presence of Human Papilloma Viruses
— a shift that makes the test far more reliable in its primary purpose.
In other words, the test is merely detecting the presence of a virus,
not making a diagnosis of a disease (which would be a much higher
standard to meet).
On October 12, 2007, HiFi DNA Tech sued the Food and Drug
Administration in an attempt to force it to downgrade its HPV detection
technology to Class II (see http://www.news-medical.net/?id=31180 ). Earlier in the year — on March 7, 2007, HiFi DNA Tech filed the HPV PCR test reclassification petition with the FDA. It is the information in this petition document that led us to the FDA’s knowledge that HPV is not linked to cervical cancer.
Got all that? This is a somewhat complex story to follow, so here it is again in summary:
• A company that manufacturers a DNA testing device that can detect
the presence of HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) is petitioning the FDA (and
suing the FDA) to get it to reclassify its medical device as a “Class
II” device based on the revelation that the FDA has already adopted the
position that HPV infections do not directly cause cervical cancer.
• This would mean that the FDA has been aware for years that HPV does not cause cervical cancer,
which means that the FDA’s approval of the Gardasil vaccine — as well
as the national push for Gardasil vaccinations — is based on a grand
medical hoax that, not surprisingly, appears to be designed to exploit
the fear of cancer to sell vaccines. The victims in all this, of
course, are the young girls who are apparently being subjected to a
medically useless (and potentially dangerous) vaccine.
• None of this information was apparently known during the more
recent debates over the safety and efficacy of Gardasil, the HPV
vaccine now in use. This means that the public debate over mandatory
HPV vaccinations lacked key elements that now seem essential to
reaching rational, evidence-based conclusions over the safety and
efficacy of such vaccines.
Next, we reveal the FDA’s statement that HPV is “not associated with cervical cancer.”
The FDA news release of March 31, 2003 acknowledges that “most
infections (by HPV) are short-lived and not associated with cervical
cancer”, in recognition of the advances in medical science and
technology since 1988. In other words, since 2003 the scientific staff
of the FDA no longer considers HPV infection to be a high-risk disease
when writing educational materials for the general public whereas the
regulatory arm of the agency is still bound by the old classification
scheme that had placed HPV test as a test to stratify risk for cervical
cancer in regulating the industry.
NewsTarget sought to verify the existence of the FDA news release
referenced by this petition reclassification document and found that,
indeed, the FDA news release exists. In fact, it’s still posted on the
FDA website at http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2003/NEW00890.html
In it, the FDA says, “The HPV DNA test is not intended to substitute
for regular Pap screening. Nor is it intended to screen women under 30
who have normal Pap tests. Although the rate of HPV infection in this
group is high, most infections are short-lived and not associated with cervical cancer.” (Emphasis added.)
In other words, the FDA knew in 2003 that HPV infections are not associated with cervical cancer.
Furthermore, the FDA states, in the same press release, “Most women
who become infected with HPV are able to eradicate the virus and suffer
no apparent long-term consequences to their health.”
In other words, HPV infections do not cause cervical cancer!
Remember, the entire push for mandatory HPV vaccinations of young girls
across the country has been the urgent call to “save” these young girls
from cervical cancer. The vaccine push has been about “savings lives.”
But as these documents clearly reveal, HPV is no threat to the lives of
young girls. In fact, as you will see below, HPV infections are
naturally self-limiting!
HPV Infections Resolve Themselves, Without Vaccines
As the reclassification petition reveals, HPV infections are
naturally self-limiting — meaning that they are controlled naturally,
without requiring intervention with drugs or vaccines. It is not the
HPV virus itself that causes cervical cancer but rather a persistent
state of ill-health on the part of the patient that makes her
vulnerable to persistent infections.
As the petition states:
“Based on new scientific information published in the past 15
years, it is now generally agreed that identifying and typing HPV
infection does not bear a direct relationship to stratification of the
risk for cervical cancer . Most acute infections caused by HPV are
self-limiting [1, 4-7]. …Repeated sequential transient HPV infections,
even when caused by “high-risk” HPVs, are characteristically not
associated with high risk of developing squamous intraepithelial
lesions, a precursor of cervical cancer.
A woman found to be positive for the same strain (genotype) of
HPV on repeated testing is highly likely suffering from a persistent
HPV infection and is considered to be at high risk of developing
precancerous intraepithelial lesions in the cervix . It is the
persistent infection, not the virus, that determines the cancer risk.”
The FDA agrees with this assessment of the relationship between HPV
and cervical cancer, as evidenced by its 2003 news release quoted above.
Next, we reveal evidence that HPV vaccines actually cause precancerous lesions in women.
The reclassification petition cited above also reveals that Gardasil
vaccines may increase the risk of developing precancerous lesions by
44.6 percent in some groups of women. This is found in a quote
referencing a document mentioned in the petition, which states:
“PCR-based HPV detection device with provision for accurate HPV
genotyping is more urgently needed now because vaccination with
Gardasil of the women who are already sero-positive and PCR-positive
for vaccine-relevant genotypes of HPV has been found to increase the
risk of developing high-grade precancerous lesions by 44.6%, according
to an FDA VRBPAC Background Document : Gardasil HPV Quadrivalent
Vaccine. May 18, 2006 VRBPAC Meeting. www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4222B3.pdf”
Sure enough, this document reveals startling information about the
extreme dangers apparently posed by Gardasil vaccinations. On page 13,
this document states:
“Concerns Regarding Primary Endpoint Analyses among Subgroups
There were two important concerns that were identified during the
course of the efficacy review of this BLA. One was the potential for
Gardasil to enhance disease among a subgroup of subjects who had
evidence of persistent infection with vaccine-relevant HPV types at
baseline. The other concern was the observations of CIN 2/3 or worse
cases due to HPV types not contained in the vaccine. These cases of
disease due to other HPV types have the potential to counter the
efficacy results of Gardasil for the HPV types contained in the vaccine.
1. Evaluation of the potential of Gardasil™ to enhance cervical
disease in subjects who had evidence of persistent infection with
vaccine-relevant HPV types prior to vaccination. The results of
exploratory subgroup analyses for study 013 suggested a concern that
subjects who were seropositive and PCR-positive for the
vaccine-relevant HPV types had a greater number of CIN 2/3 or worse
cases as demonstrated in the following table:
Observed Efficacy
- 44.6%
It appeared that subjects in this subgroup of study 013 who
received Gardasil™ might have had enhanced risk factors for development
of CIN 2/3 or worse compared to placebo recipients.”
Revealing the Dangers of Gardasil
This revelation should be quite shocking to anyone who has been
following the debate over Gardasil and mandatory vaccinations of
teenage girls. First, it reveals that Gardasil appears to increase disease by 44.6 percent in certain people — namely, those who were already carriers of the same HPV strains used in the vaccine.
In other words, it appears that if the vaccine is given to a
young woman who already carries HPV in a “harmless” state, it may
“activate” the infection and directly cause precancerous lesions to
appear. The vaccine, in other words, may accelerate the development of precancerous lesions in women.
This is information that has simply not been made available in the
debate over Gardasil vaccination policies. The pro-vaccination rhetoric
has always been about “saving lives” and it carried the implied
statement that Gardasil is perfectly safe for all women, posing
absolutely no increased risk of cancer. What these documents reveal,
however, is that Gardasil may, in fact, pose a serious increase in the
risk of cervical cancer in some recipients of the vaccine.
The FDA directly admits the vaccine is utterly useless in these
women, stating in the same document, “Finally, there is compelling
evidence that the vaccine lacks therapeutic efficacy among women who
have had prior exposure to HPV and have not cleared previous infection
(PCR positive and seropositive).”
What this essentially means is that the “safe” administering of the Gardasil vaccine requires that it be administered only to virgins
(because virtually all women who are sexually active carry HPV
strains). That, of course, would require the direct questioning of the
sexual habits of all young girls before administering the vaccine.
Is this what the Governor of Texas really had in mind when he
mandated such vaccinations for all young girls in Texas? … a male
doctor with a vaccination needle in his hand and a thirteen-year-old
girl sitting in a private clinic room behind closed doors, with the
male doctor asking her, “Have you ever had sex?”
Clearly, this kind of patient questioning crosses all kinds of ethical barriers when such vaccinations are made mandatory
(as they have been made in Texas). It puts the State in the positioning
of ascertaining the sexual habits of very young teenage girls and then
potentially causing them harm. It’s not hard to suppose that most
sexually active teenage girls would claim to still be virgins
(especially if their parents were present), creating a situation where
vaccines would be routinely administered to precisely the HPV carrier
subgroups for which it has been demonstrated to greatly increase the
risk of precancerous lesions.
In other words, under a mandatory Gardasil vaccination scenario like
what exists in Texas today, a sexually-active young teenage girl has to
make a tough choice:
1) She can lie to her doctor, claim to be a virgin, receive the
vaccine and thereby potentially increase her risk of cervical cancer.
2) She can tell her doctor she’s sexually active, thereby
surrendering her privacy and possibly subjecting herself to various
consequences from her sexual status being learned by her parents or
guardians. (One would hope, of course, that such sexual habits were not
secrets, but alas, we live in the real world where many teenage girls
do indeed have sex at a very early age…)
Furthermore, the young girl is unlikely to be given accurate
information about the health risks associated with the vaccine, since
virtually all health authorities are heavily involved in promoting
pro-vaccination propaganda, routinely ignoring scientific evidence that
might give reasonable people pause.
Naturally, the better scenario here is that the young girl is not
sexually active to begin with, but in a society where 8th and 9th
graders are already routinely engaged in sexual activities — almost
always unbeknownst to their parents — it seems naive to expect that
such girls would suddenly honor pledges of celibacy in order to protect
themselves from possible future dangers posed by a present-day vaccine
(especially when doctors blindly claim the vaccine is harmless).
There are also serious questions about the safety of the vaccine for
non-sexually-active young women. Yet even if the vaccine poses no
increased risk of cervical cancer for non-sexually-active young girls,
there’s still the more serious question of: Does the vaccine work? Does
it really prevent cervical cancer in the first place? And that question
has already been clearly answered by the FDA’s own admission that HPV
infections are not the cause of cervical cancer in the first place.
When considering the safety and effectiveness of Gardasil
vaccinations on young teens, there are essentially four quadrants to
consider, as shown in the table below:
Quadrant I: Non-Sexually Active
No Gardasil Vaccine
Quadrant II: Non-Sexually Active
Receives Gardasil Vaccine
Quadrant III: Sexually Active
No Gardasil Vaccine
Quadrant IV: Sexually Active
Receives Gardasil Vaccine
Based on what we’ve learned from the FDA’s own documents, here are the likely outcomes of each of the four quadrants:
Quadrant I: Non-Sexually Active, No Gardasil Vaccine
Outcome: No risk of cervical cancer.
Quadrant II: Non-Sexually Active, Receives Gardasil Vaccine
Outcome: No medical benefit from vaccine.
Quadrant III: Sexually Active, No Gardasil Vaccine
Outcome: HPV presence is self-limiting and does not lead to cervical cancer.
Quadrant IV: Sexually Active, Receives Gardasil Vaccine
Outcome: 44.6% Increased risk of precancerous lesions. No reduction in cancer risk.
In other words, Gardasil adds no benefits to any quadrant!
There is no subgroup that actually benefits from a Gardasil
vaccination. But there is at least one quadrant in which Gardasil
achieves an increased risk of disease. Put another way, Gardasil helps
no one, but it harms some.
This is hardly a position from which to mandate the vaccine for
everyone, especially since the vaccine has been widely prescribed as
“completely safe” for everyone. It is widely claimed by medical
authorities that the vaccine has no downside: No health risks, no
increased risk of disease and no potential to cause harm in women.
Clearly, these assumptions have no basis in scientific fact.
Keep in mind, too, that Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil, has publicly suggested that young boys
should receive Gardasil vaccinations! Why? Because they might engage in
oral sex with girls who carry the virus. Therefore, the story goes,
young boys should be vaccinated against this virus that they claim
causes cervical cancer! (Never mind the fact that boys don’t have a
cervix…) There is no end, it seems, to the pseudoscientific nonsense
that will be spouted in an effort to sell more Garsasil vaccines to
people who don’t need them.
To further investigate this conclusion, NewsTarget took a closer look at research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association
(August, 2007), entitled, “Effect of Human Papillomavirus 16/18 L1
Viruslike Particle Vaccine Among Young Women With Preexisting Infection”
This research sought to determine the usefulness of the HPV vaccine
among women who already carry HPV (which includes virtually all women
who are sexually active, regardless of their age).
This document reveals startling information about the ineffectiveness of the Gardasil vaccine. It reveals that the HPV vaccine often caused an increase in the presence of HPV strains while utterly failing to clear the viruses in most women.
These shocking results caused the study authors to publish this sobering conclusion, printed in JAMA:
“No significant evidence of a vaccine therapeutic effect was
observed in analyses restricted to women who received all doses of
vaccine or those with evidence of single HPV infections at entry
(Table2). We observed no evidence of vaccine effects when we stratified
the analysis on selected study entry characteristics reflective of
[various parameters] (TABLE3). Similarly, no evidence of vaccine
effects was observed in analyses stratified by other study entry
parameters thought to potentially influence clearance rates and
efficacy of the vaccine, including time since sexual initiation, oral
contraceptive use, cigarette smoking, and concomitant infection with C
trachomatis or N gonorrhoeae (Table 3).”
In other words, the authors found no evidence that the vaccine
worked at all. This observation led the authors to offer this damning
conclusion that appears to render Gardasil nothing more than a grand
medical hoax:
“… rates of viral clearance over a 12-month period are not influenced by vaccination.”
The study goes on to state words that should cause every doctor,
Governor and health authority across the United States (and around the
world) to rethink Gardasil vaccination policies:
“…given that viral clearance rates did not differ by treatment
group and that persistent viral infection is the best established
predictor of risk of progression, it is unlikely that vaccination could
have a significant beneficial impact on rate of lesion progression.1,17
Results from our community-based study provide strong evidence
that there is little, if any, therapeutic benefit from the vaccine in
the population we studied. Furthermore, we see no reason to believe
that there is therapeutic benefit of the vaccine elsewhere because the
biological effect of vaccination among already infected women is not
expected to vary by population.
In other words, the vaccines didn’t work on the population studied,
and there is no reason to believe that those same vaccines would
magically work on other populations, since the biology of women and HPV
is so similar across various populations.
It is difficult to take an honest look at this scientific evidence
and the statements made by the FDA and not come to the conclusion that
mandatory Gardasil vaccination policies being pushed across U.S. states
right now are based on something other than science.
There are many theories exploring the motivation for such vaccination policies. Possible theories include:
Financial benefit: Big Pharma is pushing mandatory Gardasil
vaccination policies so that it can profit from selling more vaccines
to the states. This idea is at least partially supported by the fact
that the first state Governor to mandate such vaccines (Texas Gov. Rick
Perry) had undisclosed ties to Big Pharma. (A top official in Perry’s
administration worked directly for Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil.)
Conspiracy to poison the people: This theory, which may
stretch the bounds of belief in some readers, proposes that such
mandatory vaccines are put in place in order to create future disease
by poisoning the people with dangerous chemicals and DNA fragments that
are knowingly added to vaccines. The poisoning of the people, it is
said, will pay off in future profits for Big Pharma when those people
develop other serious diseases requiring “treatment” with medications.
Many people who support this theory currently believe, for example,
that AIDS was engineered by human scientists and then administered to
the gay population in New York in the late 1980’s through vaccines.
Control the sheeple: This theory supposes that the main
purpose of mandatory vaccines is to train the American public to get
used to submitting to compulsory medicines. Once a certain segment of
the population is targeted and effectively injected with mandatory
medicines, these policies can be extended to other groups and,
eventually, can encompass the entire population.
The first theory — Financial Benefit — is the simplest and easiest
theory to believe. It requires nothing more than simple greed on the
part of Big Pharma, along with the usual level of corruption at the
FDA. NewsTarget believes this is the most likely explanation for events
surrounding Gardasil vaccination policies, but we do not rule out other
possible explanations, either.
Profits at Any Cost
What’s clear in all this is that mandatory HPV vaccination programs
are not based on anything resembling good science. They seem to be
based on a carefully planted meme — an idea that,
coincidentally, spreads from one person’s mind to the next much like a
virus, gaining momentum as the mainstream media (MSM), health
authorities, FDA and drug company reps repeat the meme on a regular
basis. And what is that meme? That HPV causes cervical cancer, and,
therefore, HPV vaccinations could halt cervical cancer and save lives.
This meme appears to have no real scientific basis. It is more of an
urban legend than anything resembling scientific fact. Furthermore, it
appears to have been conjured by those in a position to financially
benefit from the adoption of that meme (the drug companies who
manufacture, sell, and profit from the sale of HPV vaccines). In this
case, that drug company is Merck, a powerful corporation with a dubious
history rife with charges of price fixing, large-scale tax avoidance
(it set up offshore accounts to avoid billions in U.S. taxes),
widespread biopiracy, conspiring with the FDA to discredit its critics,
burying negative evidence about its drugs (see the history of Vioxx at www.NewsTarget.com/vioxx.html ) and numerous other actions that many consider to be criminal in nature.
There is no question that Merck has the lack of ethics, the
willingness and the means to commit medical fraud on an unprecedented
scale. Based on the information revealed in this report, the mandatory
vaccination of young girls with Gardasil appears to be the boldest
medical hoax yet perpetrated by the company. You can read the true
history about Merck and its crimes at: http://www.newstarget.com/Merck.html
NewsTarget believes Merck is currently engaged in a massive medical
fraud, and that it has influenced, corrupted or otherwise recruited FDA
officials and state health authorities in a grand scheme to sell
vaccines that are at best medically worthless, and at worst medically
dangerous. Halting cervical cancer seems to have nothing to do with the
marketing and prescribing of Gardasil. The entire campaign push for
mandatory HPV vaccinations seems to be based entirely in the realm of
sales and marketing.
The “marketing” of HPV vaccines involves classic disease mongering —
spreading fear about a disease as a way of corralling patients into
begging for the “solution” that just happens to be readily available
from the same pharmaceutical company that promoted the disease in the
first place. The hype over cervical cancer and Gardasil seems to be
nothing more than a classic case of fear-based marketing designed to
create such consumer fear over cervical cancer that a massive public
outcry would result in legislation mandating the vaccines.
Please share this article with others.
Permission is granted to reprint this article in its entirety, for
any non-commercial purpose, as long as full credit is given to the
author (Mike Adams) and a clearly visible clickable link is placed back
to this URL at NewsTarget.com. You may also freely quote from this
article with proper citation.
Effect of Human Papillomavirus 16/18 L1 Viruslike Particle Vaccine Among Young Women With Preexisting Infection
Journal of the American Medical Association, August, 2007
WeAreChange Chicago Myspace Bulletin A SEARING INDICTMENT Famed
prosecutor and #1 New York Times bestselling author Vincent Bugliosi
has written the most powerful, explosive, and thought-provoking book of
his storied career. As a prosecutor dedicated to seeking justice, he
delivers a non-partisan argument, free from party lines, based upon
hard facts and pure objectivity.
More
“SOMEONE HAS TO PAY” In
The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder, Bugliosi presents a
tight, meticulously researched legal case that puts George W. Bush on
trial in an American courtroom for the murder of nearly 4,000 American
soldiers fighting in Iraq. Watch this video interview to learn why he
believes we must bring those responsible for the war in Iraq to justice.
Seven
years after the attacks of September the Eleventh, a global awakening
has taken place, the likes of which the world has never seen. As the
corporate-controlled media dwindles into extinction, a new breed of
journalists and activists has emerged.
Join Alex Jones, Luke Rudkowski
and others as they set out on a mission determined to expose the
ruthless global elite, and alert the masses to the truth about 9/11.
Strap in and get ready to ride along as criminal overlords David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Alan Greenspan, John McCain, and many others are confronted about their lies and manipulation.
Including interviews with Jesse Ventura, Rosie O'Donnell, George Carlin, Willie Nelson and Martin Sheen,
this film is unlike anything you have ever seen. the only question
after viewing it is, will you become part of the Truth Rising.
The documentary provides an in-depth look at the plight
of 9/11 first responders, many afflicted with serious health problems
from the toxicity of Ground Zero. Truth Rising reveals and challenges
the astounding arrogance and negligence of the government in regard to
the heroic efforts of first responders, police, and fire-fighters.
Truth Rising indicts the administration of Rudy Giuliani and that of
the EPA and Christine Todd Whitman, who proclaimed the air in lower
Manhattan was safe to breathe, contrary to numerous warnings to the
contrary.
Rockefeller minion, trilateralist, and CFR member Zbigniew Brzezinski tells Luke Rudkowski to "Please sit down and shut up."
Truth Rising is a tool for 9/11 activists
The 9/11 Chronicles: Part One, Truth Rising is the first extensive
documentary on the 9/11 truth movement. It serves as an ideal
educational tool for those either uninformed about this growing
movement or those wanting to know more. It is imperative that Truth
Rising reach as many people as possible. Please purchase a copy of
Truth Rising, make copies, and give them to your family, friends, and
strangers on the street.
From Prison Planet:
An Alex Jones Film. Coming to the Infowar July 4th, 2008 & online first at Prison Planet.tv.
This
film follows the growing momentum of 9/11 truth, as people throughout
the world take action against their globalist masters. Shot unlike
anything you have ever experienced from Alex Jones, cinema verite'
style, this masterpiece not only exposes the mistreatment of our 9/11
heroes, but also shows how a growing number of people around the world
are questioning the official version of events that day. Featuring
interviews with Willie Nelson, Rosie O'Donnell, Jesse Ventura, George
Carlin, Martin Sheen, as well as confrontations with many political
figures including Bill Clinton, David Rockefeller and Arnold
Schwarzenegger.
From Infowars
Matt
Lepacek of We Are Change and Greater NYC Ron Paul Revolutionaries
confronts Rudy Giuliani on his foreknowledge of the towers collapsing.
Truth Rising: An Answer to the Lies of the Global Elite:
9/11 Chronicles: Part One, Truth Rising is a testament to free speech,
an endangered commodity in post September 11, 2001 America. Alex Jones’
latest documentary is a vivid testament standing in complete and
defiant opposition to former White House press secretary Ari
Fleischer’s admonishment that “nowadays you have to be careful what you
say and do,” as if the orchestrated events of that horrible day have
nullified the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In Jones’ latest
documentary, filmed in cinéma-vérité style — an appropriate technique,
as the phrase translates from the French as “cinema of truth” — we
witness repeated instances of police insisting the First Amendment is a
dead letter and citizens no longer have the right to speak their minds
in public, especially citizens going up against the imposed political
orthodoxy and Fleischer’s counsel.
New World Order kingpin David Rockefeller is contronted by We Are Change.
Truth Rising also reveals that it is not only New
York City’s militarized police who believe the First Amendment is
moribund, but many citizens do as well. “You ain’t American,” insists
one such fine specimen at Ground Zero, angry over the possibility that
somebody would actually dare contest the official version of events and
ask questions and demand answers. Others fling mindless and obscene
epithets and swipe at the camera, as if incapable of tolerating, let
alone understanding and respecting the First Amendment, an absolute
freedom that occupies a preferred position in the pantheon of our
liberties. In post-9/11 America, the exercise of free speech is
relegated to government mandated “free speech zones” and to insist the
whole of the country is a free speech zone casts one in dark suspicion
along with the likes Osama and the manufactured enemies of America.
Hillary Clinton cackles when confronted about her association with the Bilderbergers.
Ari Fleischer’s warning is particularly injurious when
it comes to the families of 9/11 victims and first responders, the
latter consistently ignored, especially by the corporate media. In
Truth Rising, first responder and former Iraq war vet David Miller, who
is now reduced to toting around a respirator after his exposure to the
toxicity of Ground Zero, takes the corporate media to task, rightfully
characterizing this corporate cabal as “propagandists,” and
“professional lairs and tools who cannot by any stretch of the
imagination be considered journalists.” Miller, We Are Change, and
unnumbered and mostly anonymous others have stepped forward to fill the
imposed void of this deplorable corporate media silence — a deliberate
suppression at the hands of their elitist taskmasters — with an
indefatigable call not only for answers, but a demand that justice be
delivered to the victims.
Rudkowski confronts John McCain, demands a new 9/11 investigation.
Manny Badillo, a 9/11 victim family member,
reminds us in Truth Rising that “70% of family members’ questions were
never answered during the 9/11 commission report. What if one of our
family members were murdered, would we be okay with 70% of their
questions never being answered during any trial? There still has never
been a trial for those who have died, there still has been nobody held
accountable.”
The 9/11 Chronicles demands those who killed 2,819 innocents,
including well over 300 first responders, be called out and brought to
justice. It is an effort to bring needed attention to the surviving
first responders who are sick and dying in alarming numbers. It is an
urgently needed effort to counter the disparaging propaganda of the
corporate media — in particular but hardly limited to Hearst
Corporation’s Popular Mechanics and its unscrupulous scheme to
undermine the movement – a propagandistic media tasked with viciously
mischaracterizing and slandering 9/11 truth activists as nothing short
of crackpots and lunatics. Truth Rising is an answer to dismissive
accusations. It documents a growing movement the corporate media
refuses to cover without bias and detraction.
Bill Clinton attempts to make a joke about the "Bohemian Club."
If you want to respond to these accusations, get 9/11
Chronicles: Part One, Truth Rising, and make copies, hand them out to
your family, friends, and strangers on the street. Alex Jones, Luke
Rudkowski, and many others featured in this documentary are patriots
and heroes, not fruitcakes and traitors, as the corporate media insists
at the behest of the government. Globalists and neocons within the
government are afraid of the sort of truth so effectively presented in
the 9/11 Chronicles. They are desperate to make sure the people never
know the truth.
“How dare you” respond to lies and false history and
deliver the light of truth to the darkness of criminal mendacity,
rebuked Bill Clinton in Truth Rising when confronted by We Are Change.
How dare you respond to one of the largest and most outrageous lies of
American history? Clinton’s response is evidence proof positive our
rulers are afraid of the truth finally finding the light of day. In
Jones’ film, Rockefeller minion Zbigniew Brzezinski demands truth “sit
down and shut up,” but it is too late now for that. Truth is on the
street. It will not be silenced and 9/11 Chronicles: Part One, Truth
Rising will make sure it spreads far and wide.
Mayor Bloomberg's thugs assault We Are Change for daring to ask his lordship a few questions.
From Prison Planet Seven
years after the attacks of September the Eleventh, a global awakening
has taken place, the likes of which the world has never seen. As the
corporate-controlled media dwindles into extinction, a new breed of
journalists and activists has emerged.
Shot unlike anything you have ever experienced from Alex
Jones, cinema verite’ style, this masterpiece not only exposes the
mistreatment of our 9/11 heroes, but also shows how a growing number of
people around the world are questioning the official version of events
that day.
Featuring interviews with Willie Nelson, Rosie
O’Donnell, Jesse Ventura, George Carlin, Martin Sheen, as well as
confrontations with many political figures including Bill Clinton,
David Rockefeller and Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Here’s a new article by Mike Rudin, that’s been posted on the BBC
News website. It mentions that NIST says “fire fighters could not fight
the fires in Tower 7, because they didn’t have enough water and focused
on saving lives.” However, NIST’s claim is incorrect. There were in
fact fireboats that had been moored near the WTC the morning of 9/11,
to provide water to the site. See: http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/17_Pharvey.html
One of the boats, the John J. Harvey, could reportedly “pump 16,000 to 20,000 gallons of water a minute. ‘That’s the equivalent of 15 [fire] engines drafting water,’ explained 65-year-old FDNY retiree Bob Lenney, who spent 25 years piloting Harvey.” See: http://www.fireboat.org/press/time_out_092701.asp
In fact, one of NIST’s earlier reports stated, “According to the
FDNY first-person interviews, water was never an issue at WTC 7 since
firefighting was never started in the building.” See: http://wtc.nist.gov/NISTNCSTAR1-8.pdf (p. 110).
9/11 third tower mystery ’solved’
By Mike Rudin
BBC, Conspiracy Files
The final mystery of 9/11 will soon be solved, according to
US experts investigating the collapse of the third tower at the World
Trade Center.
The 47-storey third tower, known as Tower Seven, collapsed seven hours after the twin towers.
Investigators are expected to say ordinary fires on several different floors caused the collapse.
Conspiracy theorists have argued that the third tower was brought down in a controlled demolition.
Unlike the twin towers, Tower Seven was not hit by a plane.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology, based near
Washington DC, is expected to conclude in its long-awaited report this
month that ordinary fires caused the building to collapse.
That would make it the first and only steel skyscraper in the world to collapse because of fire.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology’s lead
investigator, Dr Shyam Sunder, spoke to BBC Two’s “The Conspiracy
Files”:
“Our working hypothesis now actually suggests that it was normal
building fires that were growing and spreading throughout the multiple
floors that may have caused the ultimate collapse of the buildings.”
‘Smoking gun’
However, a group of architects, engineers and scientists say the
official explanation that fires caused the collapse is impossible.
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth argue there must have been a
controlled demolition.
The founder of the group, Richard Gage, says the collapse of the
third tower is an obvious example of a controlled demolition using
explosives.
“Building Seven is the smoking gun of 9/11… A sixth grader can look
at this building falling at virtually freefall speed, symmetrically and
smoothly, and see that it is not a natural process.
“Buildings that fall in natural processes fall to the path of least
resistance”, says Gage, “they don’t go straight down through
themselves.”
Conspiracy theories
There are a number of facts that have encouraged conspiracy theories about Tower Seven.
Although its collapse potentially made architectural history, all
of the thousands of tonnes of steel from the skyscraper were taken away
to be melted down.
The third tower was occupied by the Secret Service, the CIA, the
Department of Defence and the Office of Emergency Management, which
would co-ordinate any response to a disaster or a terrorist attack.
The destruction of the third tower was never mentioned in the 9/11
Commission Report. The first official inquiry into Tower Seven by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency was unable to be definitive about
what caused its collapse.
In May 2002 FEMA concluded that the building collapsed because
intense fires had burned for hours, fed by thousands of gallons of
diesel stored in the building. But it said this had “only a low
probability of occurrence” and more work was needed.
But now nearly seven years after 9/11 the definitive official
explanation of what happened to Tower Seven is finally about to be
published in America.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology has spent more
than two years investigating Tower Seven but lead investigator Dr Shyam
Sunder rejects criticism that it has been slow.
“We’ve been at this for a little over two years and doing a two or
two and a half year investigation is not at all unusual. That’s the
same kind of time frame that takes place when we do aeroplane crash
investigations, it takes a few years.”
With no steel from Tower 7 to study, investigators have instead made
four extremely complex computer models worked out to the finest detail.
They’re confident their approach can now provide the answers. Dr Sunder
says the investigation is moving as fast as possible.
“It’s a very complex problem. It requires a level of fidelity in the
modelling and rigour in the analysis that has never been done before.”
Other skyscrapers haven’t fully collapsed before because of fire. But NIST argues that what happened on 9/11 was unique.
Steel structure weakened
It says Tower Seven had an unusual design, built over an electricity
substation and a subway; there were many fires that burnt for hours;
and crucially, fire fighters could not fight the fires in Tower 7,
because they didn’t have enough water and focused on saving lives.
Investigators have focused on the east side where the long floor spans were under most stress.
They think fires burnt long enough to weaken and break many of the connections that held the steel structure together.
Most susceptible were the thinner floor beams which required less
fireproofing, and the connections between the beams and the columns. As
they heated up the connections failed and the beams sagged and failed,
investigators say.
The collapse of the first of the Twin Towers does not seem to have
caused any serious damage to Tower Seven, but the second collapse of
the 1,368ft (417m) North Tower threw debris at Tower Seven, just 350ft
(106m) away.
Tower Seven came down at 5.21pm. Until now most of the photographs
have been of the three sides of the building that did not show much
obvious physical damage. Now new photos of the south side of the
building, which crucially faced the North Tower, show that whole side
damaged and engulfed in smoke.
Seven years after the attacks of 9/11, a global awakening has taken
place, the likes of which the world has never seen. As the corporate-controlled
media dwindles into extinction, a new breed of journalists and activists
has emerged. Click
here to watch 9/11 Chronicles Part One: Truth Rising
online in high quality now!
PARIS (Thomson Financial) - Leaders of the Colombian FARC rebel movement were paid millions of dollars to free Colombian politician Ingrid Betancourt and 14 other hostages, Swiss radio said on Friday, quoting 'a reliable source'.
The 15 hostages released on Wednesday by the Colombian army 'were in reality ransomed for a high price, and the whole operation afterwards was a set-up,' the radio's French-language channel said.
Saying the United States, which had three of its citizens among those freed, was behind the deal, it put the price of the ransom at some $20 million.
The radio said its source was 'close to the events, reliable and tested many times in recent years.'
The report added said the wife of one of the hostages' guards was the go-between, having been arrested by the Colombian army. She was released to return to the guerrillas, where she persuaded her husband to change sides.
Switzerland, along with France and Spain, has been mediating with the FARC on behalf of Colombian President Alvaro Uribe.
According to the official version of Wednesday's operation, a Colombian army intelligence agent infiltrated the FARC and tricked the rebels into believing their top leader had sent a helicopter to pick up the hostages.
Colombian soldiers posing as FARC guerrillas flew the hostages from a jungle hideout where they had been assembled before revealing their identity.
White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said the rescue 'was conceived by the Colombians and executed by the Colombians with our full support,' while implying that Washington had provided intelligence and even operational help.
U.S. ambassador to Bogota William Brownfield also told CNN that Washington had provided 'technical support,' while Colombian Defence Minister Juan Manuel Santos insisted it was a '100 percent Colombian' effort.
The top U.S. military officer for Latin America, Admiral Jim Stavridis, head of United States Southern Command, said the rescue of Americans Thomas Howes, Marc Gonsalves and Keith Stansell had been 'a priority of this command'.
The three were seized by the rebels as they conducted an anti-drug mission for the Pentagon in February 2003.
The operation enhanced Uribe's prestige as he seeks a third term in office, and enabled him to stick to his line of no talks with the rebels without the hostages being freed, the radio noted.
tf.TFN-Europe_newsdesk@thomsonreuters.com
